271 Or. App. 261 - State v. Munoz-Juarez’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a manner that would create the nonsensical result that a defendant can be convicted of two counts of attempted aggravated murder for attempting to murder two victims in the same criminal episode *** but nonetheless cannot be convicted of one count of attempted aggravated murder and one count of the lesser offense of attempted murder for the exact same conduct”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gensitskiy“' ORS 161.067(2) forecloses merger in all cases in which a single criminal episode involves multiple victims.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gensitskiy“as many separately punishable offenses as there are victims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gensitskiy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.