Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 271 ORAPP 292 - State v. Taylor

State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To preserve a claim of error concerning the legal sufficiency of the state's evidence, a defendant must-even in a case tried to the court-challenge the legal sufficiency of the evidence at trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In a bench trial, a defendant can preserve a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence if the 'defendant clearly raises the issue in closing argument.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.