Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 271 ORAPP 312 - State v. Barnthouse

State v. Barnthouse’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 39 U.S.C. § 404

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that, for the purposes of Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution, law enforcement illegally seized [the] package by removing it from the stream of mail and submitting it to a dog sniff.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A seizure or search is unreasonable if it is not authorized by a warrant (supported by probable cause) or otherwise justified under an exception to the warrant requirement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “No law shall violate the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable search, or seizure[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.