Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 271 P2D 381 - Mohawk Drilling Co. v. Biffle

Mohawk Drilling Co. v. Biffle’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
September 1959
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Commercial Drilling Co. v. Kennedy · Midland Valley Railroad Co. v. Price · Gripe v. Hatmaker · Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Jones · Carter Oil Co. v. Jackson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where the instructions of the Court do not cover special theories or defenses relied upon the complaining party is bound to call the Court’s attention to the omission by an appropriate request for additional instructions, or he will be precluded from making such failure available as reversible error.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.