Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 271 P2D 751 - Eidson v. State

Eidson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 1955
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 95 Okla. Crim. 131 - Williams v. State · 66 Okla. Crim. 327 - Linthicum v. State · 73 Okla. Crim. 355 - Staley v. State · 90 Okla. Crim. 260 - Layman v. State · Littke v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““These cases all in substance hold that, where two or more families reside on the land or place searched the warrant directing the indiscriminate search of such a place is a blanket warrant. It is the intent of the constitutional inhibition as applied to blanket warrants to prevent the unlawful search of the private place of abode of two or. more families. Littke v. State, Okl.Cr., 267 P.2d 614 ; Williams v. State [ 95 Okl.Cr. 131 ], 240 P.2d 1132 , 31 A,L.R.2d 851.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.