Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 271 P3D 457 - Phillips v. State

Phillips v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Reeves v. State · Amidon v. State · Blake v. Gilbert · Burrell v. Burrell · Nelson v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On the separate issue of whether, given the circumstances, reasonable people would question the judge's ability to be fair, the proper standard of review is de novo-because 'reasonable appearance of bias' is assessed under an objective standard.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “. But as we did in Phillips, we will decide Crawford's case under the assumption that Alaska law mandates disqualification of a judge when the cireumstances give rise to a reasonable appearance of bias, even when there is no proof that the judge is actually biased. As to what sort of appearance of bias will require a judge's disqualification, we note that the Comment to Alaska Judicial Canon 2A declares that the test is”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[slome-times one must look beyond what a court says it is doing and, instead, focus on what the court actually is doing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.