Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

271 So. 2d 126

Florida Bar

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 13, 1972

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1972-12-13

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 2010

2 state decisions

Relies on Florida Bar v. Ossinsky

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1972-12-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The Florida Bar petitioned us for a notice to show cause directed to Respondent Max I. Ossinsky, alleging he had practiced law in violation of this Court’s suspension order appearing in The Florida Bar v. Ossinsky, Fla.1971, 255 So.2d 526.

¶2The Respondent, Max I. Ossinsky, has filed a response to the notice to show cause *127in which he alleges certain matters and things in avoidance of the allegations of The Florida Bar in its petition for notice to show cause.

¶3The petition for notice to show cause and the response thereto present issues of law and fact requiring an evidentiary hearing in this matter.

¶4The hearing shall be confined to specific charges or allegations of violations of the suspension order contained in the Bar’s Petition for the notice to show cause, and no others.

¶5It is therefore ordered that Honorable P. B. Revels, Circuit Judge (Ret.) be and he is appointed as Commissioner to hold an appropriate evidentiary hearing in this matter and to report his findings and recommendations to this Court at the earliest convenient date.

¶6It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
/271/so2d/126 · .json · Public domain