Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 271 SW3D 281 - State v. Sheppard

State v. Sheppard’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

41 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Ornelas v. United States · United States v. Sokolow · Mincey v. Arizona · Michigan v. Long

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[1] the amount of force displayed, [2] the duration of a detention, [3] the efficiency of the investigative process and whether it is conducted at the original location or the person is transported to another location, [4] the officer’s expressed intent — that is, whether he told the detained person that he was under arrest or was being detained only for a temporary investigation, and [5] any other relevant factors.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[F]actual findings are who did what, when, where, how, or why. They also include credibility determinations. They do not include legal rulings on ‘reasonable suspicion' or 'probable cause’; those are legal conclusions subject to de novo review, not deference.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.