Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 271 SW3D 801 - Ex Parte Graves

Ex Parte Graves’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 21st Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · North Carolina v. Pearce · Burks v. United States · Kyles v. Whitley · Tibbs v. Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]n applicant may use pretrial writs to assert his or her constitutional protections with respect to double jeopardy and bail. We reasoned that these protections would be effectively undermined if these issues were not cognizable. Conversely, we have held that an applicant may not use a pretrial writ to assert his or her constitutional rights to a speedy trial, challenge a denial of a pretrial motion to suppress, or make a collateral estoppel claim that does not allege a double jeopardy violation. These issues are better addressed by a post-conviction appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.