Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 271 U.S. 259 - Turner Dennis Lowry Lumber Co v. Chicago M & St Paul Ry Co

Turner Dennis Lowry Lumber Co v. Chicago M & St Paul Ry Co’s Empirical Analysis

271 U.S. 259 · 1926

Citation profile

205
cited by 205 later decisions
13
cited 13 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
November 2009
most recently cited

96 federal appellate · 28 district · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 205 later decisions (13 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2009 · most notably Switchmen's Union of North America v. National Mediation Board (1943), Stark v. Wickard (1944)

96 federal appellate · 28 district · 15 state decisions

490192619301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Great Northern Railway Co. v. Merchants Elevator Co. · Swift Company v. Hocking Valley Railway Company · Great Northern Ry Co v. Merchants' Elevator Co · Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Rice · Edward Hines Yellow Pine Trustees v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 205 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““All demurrage charges have a double purpose. One is to secure compensation for the use of the ear and of the track which it occupies. The other is to promote ear efficiency by providing a deterrent against undue detention.” Turner, Dennis & Lowry Lumber Co. v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co., 271 U. S. 259 , 46 S. Ct. 530 , 531, 70 L. Ed. 934 .”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.