Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 271 U.S. 432 - United States v. Candelaria

United States v. Candelaria’s Empirical Analysis

271 U.S. 432 · 1926

Citation profile

439
cited by 439 later decisions
57
cited 57 times by the Supreme Court
12
states following
October 2023
most recently cited

171 federal appellate · 60 district · 82 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 439 later decisions (57 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2023 · most notably United States v. Mitchell (1983), Williams v. Lee (1959)

171 federal appellate · 60 district · 82 state decisions — followed in 12 states

82019261930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedJames v. Germania Iron Co. (from Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Heckman v. United States · Lone Wolf v. Ethan a Hitchcock · Alaska Pacific Fisheries v. United States · United States v. Felipe Sandoval · United States v. Moser

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 439 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a body of Indians of the same or a similar race, united in a community under one leadership or government, and inhabiting a particular though sometimes ill-defined territory.”
    20 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “be alienated in any wise without (the Government's) consent . . .”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““That no purchase, grant, lease, or other conveyance of lands, or of any title or claim thereto, from any Indian nation or tribe of Indians, shall be of any validity in law or equity, unless the same be made by treaty or convention entered into pursuant to the constitution. * * *»”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.