Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 271 U.S. 65 - Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. State of New York

Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. State of New York’s Empirical Analysis

271 U.S. 65 · 1926

Citation profile

109
cited by 109 later decisions
27
cited 27 times by the Supreme Court
12
states following
November 2013
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 4 district · 31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 109 later decisions (27 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2013 · most notably Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. Kneip (1977), United States v. Oregon (1935)

20 federal appellate · 4 district · 31 state decisions — followed in 12 states

2701926193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Shively v. Bowlby · Hardin v. Jordan · United States v. Holt State Bank · John Pollard et al. v. John Hagan et al. · Illinois Central Railroad v. Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 109 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “.“The dominion over navigable waters, and property in the soil under them, are so identified with the exercise of the sovereign powers of government that a' presumption against their separation from sovereignty must be indulged, in construing all grants by. the sovereign, of”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Long acquiescence in the possession of territory and the exercise of dominion and sovereignty over it may have a controlling effect in the determination of a disputed boundary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he rights of property and dominion in the lands discovered by those acting under royal authority were held to vest in the Crown,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.