Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 271 Va. 231 - Overbey v. Commonwealth

Overbey v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2013
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Supinger v. Stakes · Palmer v. Com.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] court may not engage in conjecture or surmise in determining the offense for which a defendant was convicted. Thus, when the Commonwealth seeks to prove a prior conviction as an element of a crime by presenting an order entered in that prior case, the order must show that a judgment of conviction was entered in adjudication of the charge.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[b]ased on the plea of guilty, stip[ulation] & summary of evid[ence], Ct finds def guilty and refer for PO report.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[W]hen the fact of a prior conviction is an element of a charged offense, the burden is on the Commonwealth to prove that prior conviction beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.