271 Wis. 2d 469 - State v. Beasley’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 2021
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · State v. Multaler · 219 Wis. 2d 739 - State v. Anderson · State v. Derango · State v. Davison
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Penalty enhancers . . . authorize specified increases to separate specified penalties for underlying crimes. Thus, the underlying crime has a penalty, and the enhancer adds an additional penalty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“Section 943.10(2) incorporates the definition of burglary contained in § 943.10(1).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“multiple enhancers may normally be applied to the same underlying crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.