¶1Ralph J. Monaco, New London, in support of the petition.
¶2Lloyd L. Langhammer, Norwich, in opposition.
¶3The defendants' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 85 Conn.App. 615, 858 A.2d 806 (2004), is denied.
272 Conn. 916
866 A.2d 1287
Robert MISKIMEN et al. v. Hyman BIBER et al.
Decided January 20, 2005.
Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 2005-01-20
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently June 2016
19 state decisions
Relies on 85 Conn. App. 615 - Miskimen v. Biber
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2005-01-20
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Ralph J. Monaco, New London, in support of the petition.
¶2Lloyd L. Langhammer, Norwich, in opposition.
¶3The defendants' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 85 Conn.App. 615, 858 A.2d 806 (2004), is denied.