Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

272 F. 1021

Docket No. 3248.

Expanded Metal Co. v. General Fireproofing Co.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 1921.)

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1921-03-18

<p>Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Ohio; D. C. Westenhaver, Judge.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1936

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Expanded Metal Co. v. General Fireproofing Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1921-03-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Ohio; D. C. Westenhaver, Judge.

¶2For opinion below, see 247 Fed. 899.

¶3Fay Oberlin & Fay and Price, Alburn, Crum & Album, all of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellants.

¶4Fred L. Chappell, of Kalamazoo, Mich., Charles Neave, of New York City, and Hoyt, Dustin, Kelley, McKeehan & Andrews, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6Dismissed, pursuant to stipulation of counsel.

/272/f1d/1021 · .json · Public domain