Wasserfallen v. Strifler

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted March 22, 1921.

Decided May 2, 1921.)

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1921-05-02

<p>Appeal from a Decision of the Commissioner of Patents. Interference proceeding between Charles F. Wasserfallen and Chester E. Strifler. From a decision for Strifler, Wasserfallen appeals.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 1963

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1921-05-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Appeal from a Decision of the Commissioner of Patents. Interference proceeding between Charles F. Wasserfallen and Chester E. Strifler. From a decision for Strifler, Wasserfallen appeals.

¶2Affirmed.

¶3Otto F. Barthel, of Detroit, Mich., and Theodore K. Bryant, of Washington, D. G., for appellant.

¶4Frederick S. Byon, of Los Angeles, Cal., and W. W. Dodge, of Washington, D. C., for ap-pellee.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6Appeal from the Commissioner of Patents in an interference proceeding involving an invention for attachments to automobiles for carrying spare rims and tires. The case turns solely upon issues of fact. The tribunals of the Patent Office concurred in awarding priority to Strifler. A careful review of the record convinces us that no error has been committed. The decision of the Commissioner of Patents is affirmed. Affirmed.

¶7Mr. Justice HITZ, of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, sat in the place of Mr. Justice ROBB.