Lundberg v. Dixner’s Empirical Analysis
272 F. 107 · 1920
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 1927
most recently cited
2 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Gilpin v. Merchants' Nat. Bank · Samet v. Farmers' & Merchants' Nat. Bank of Baltimore · In re Morgan · In re Stafford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““But the law also is that, to bring a statement within that section [Sec. 32], it must have been intentionally and knowingly false and coupled with an intention to deceive. The creditor must also have relied upon the statement when parting with his money or his property.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.