Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

272 F.2d 564

Docket No. 15106.

Williams v. Greenblatt

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Nov. 12, 1959.

Decided Nov. 25, 1959.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1959-11-25

2 counsel of record

Relies on Shewmaker v. Capital Transit Co. · Capital Transit Co. v. Gamble

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1959-11-25

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 1971

12 federal appellate ·

90195919601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Mr. Albert J. Ahern, Jr., Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. James J. Laughlin, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellants.

¶2Mr. Thomas J. Ahern, Jr., Washington, D. C., for appellee.

¶3Before Edgerton, Danaher and Bastian, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The plaintiff child suddenly and without warning ran through a thick hedge bordering an alley just as the defendant’s car turned in from the street. She collided with the car which was almost instantly brought to a stop. Following the procedure authorized by Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(b), 28 U.S.C.A., and a practice which we have previously approved,1 the Dis*565trict Judge allowed the jury to consider the controverted issues as to negligence and contributory negligence. After a plaintiff’s verdict had been returned, he granted the defendant’s motion for judgment n. o. v. We are satisfied that in such exercise of his legal discretion no error resulted.2 3

¶6Affirmed.

/272/f2d/564 · .json · Public domain