Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 272 F.3d 49 - Paul Lohnes v. Level Communications Inc

Paul Lohnes v. Level Communications Inc’s Empirical Analysis

272 F.3d 49 · 2001

Citation profile

94
cited by 94 later decisions
June 2024
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 45 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 94 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably Poulis-Minott v. Smith (2004), Dura Automotive Systems of Indiana, Inc. v. CTS Corp. (2002)

31 federal appellate · 45 district ·

490200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Zannino · Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc. · Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC ASSOCIATES · McCarthy v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. · Helvering v. Southwest Consolidated Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 94 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] party that without substantial justification fails to disclose information required by Rule 26(a) ... is not, unless such failure is harmless, permitted to use as evidence ... any witness or information not so disclosed.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a narrow escape hatch that allows the court to admit belatedly proffered expert evidence if the proponent's failure to reveal it was either substantially justified or harmless.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]he maxim expressio unius est exclusio alterius instructs that, `when parties list specific items in a document, any item not so listed is typically thought to be excluded.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.