Reeves v. Battles’s Empirical Analysis
272 F.3d 918 · 2001
Citation profile
8 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Cupp v. Naughten · Henderson v. Kibbe · Whitehead v. Cowan · United States v. Sielaff · Nichols v. Gagnon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We review the district court's findings of fact for clear error and its rulings on issues of law de novo.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Armstead v. Frank“omission, or an incomplete instruction, is less likely to be prejudicial than a misstatement of the law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Armstead v. Frank
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.