Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 272 FAPPX 188 - Thompson v. Austin

Thompson v. Austin’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
August 2018
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Fineman v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. · United States v. Zehrbach · Bennis v. Gable · Hurtt v. Stirone · United States v. Jimenez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hile the jury was free to find that Austin did not violate the motor vehicle code, it was required to find he was negligent per se if it found that he did violate the code.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.