Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

272 F. App'x 308

Furtado v. Rupp

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided April 4, 2008

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2008-04-04

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Decided 2008-04-04

¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. ,

¶2Unpublished opinions are pot binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Edson Furtado appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). In his informal appellate brief, Furtado failed to address the district court’s basis for dismissing his case. Therefore, Furtado has waived ap*309pellate review of that issue. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b) (“The Court will limit its review to the issues raised in the informal brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm. Furtado’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4AFFIRMED.

/272/fappx/308 · .json · Public domain