Smith v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 1996
2 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Princess Lida of Thurn & Taxis v. Thompson · Kittredge v. Stevens · Cottingham v. Hall · Eyber v. Dominion National Bank of Bristol Office
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]n accounting 'is a purely administrative matter over which federal courts have no jurisdiction.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Law v. Law
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.