State v. Ray’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently May 2020 · most notably Harris v. State (2001), Brown v. State (2004)
31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Vansant v. State · Franks v. State · State v. Ritter · State v. Henderson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under Georgia law, only voluntary incriminating statements are admissible against the accused at trial. OCGA § 24-3-50. ... To make a confession admissible, it must have been made voluntarily, i.e., “without being induced by another by the slightest hope of benefit or remotest fear of injury.” [Cits.] The “slightest hope of benefit” in OCGA § 24-3-50 means the hope of a lighter sentence. [Cit.] 8”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.