Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 272 Ga. 608 - Stobbart v. State

Stobbart v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
2
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably Barrett v. State (2012), Culler v. State (2004)

33 state decisions

160200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Dunagan v. State · Smith v. State · Adsitt v. State · Laster v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To make a prima facie showing of justification so as to allow evidence of violent acts by the victim against third parties, “the defendant must show that the victim was the aggressor, the victim assaulted the defendant, and the defendant was honestly trying to defend himself.” [Cit.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he statute is clearly concerned with the use of deadly force to counter entry, or attempted entry, into the home . . . , and there is no evidence that [the victim] made any threats against the habitation. Further, he was there as a guest of [Harris], who was a resident of the [house], and defense of habitation is not a defense available to a defendant when the victim is a guest in the home.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he only testimony was that in pointing the pistol at [Sheldt and Smith], he did so intentionally, not “consciously disregarding a substantial and unjustifiable risk that his act or omission would cause harm or endanger [their] safety,” and consequently the trial court properly refused to give a jury instruction on reckless conduct. 22”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.