Hill v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2015
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Stephens v. State · Jefferson v. Zant · Woods v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Hill argues that the trial court erred in refusing to allow him to testify concerning [the victim]'s prior violent acts against third parties, maintaining that his testimony was relevant to his state of mind at the time of the shooting.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]o the extent that Hill's complaint is that he should have been permitted to testify to [the victim's] reputation for violence,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“hearsay testimony was not competent to establish evidence of [the victim's] prior violent acts,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.