Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 272 Ga. App. 152 - Sherls v. State

272 Ga. App. 152 - Sherls v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2007
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 269 Ga. App. 407 - Horton v. State · 224 Ga. App. 816 - Thomas v. State · 267 Ga. App. 612 - Standfill v. State · Reid v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where the error alleged is that certain evidence has been wrongfully excluded, the rule is well settled that there must have been a proffer or offer of a definite sort so that both the trial court and the appellate court can know whether the evidence really exists. In the absence of such a proffer, the assignment of error is so incomplete as to preclude its consideration by this court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.