Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 272 Kan. 758 - In Re Coder

In Re Coder’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
June 2014
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of John Ruffalo Jr · In re Ruffalo · State v. Turner · State v. Caenen · In Re Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Decisions subsequent to Ruffalo have refined the concept of due process as it applies to lawyer disciplinary hearings, and suggest that the notice to be provided be more in the nature of that provided in civil cases. The weight of authority appears to be that, unlike due process provided in criminal actions, there are no stringent or technical requirements in setting forth allegations or descriptions of alleged offenses .... Due process requires only that the charges must be sufficiently clear and specific to inform the attorney of the misconduct eharged[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.