Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 272 MO 319 - Moseley v. Bogy

Moseley v. Bogy’s Empirical Analysis

1917

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
3
states following
December 1954
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently December 1954

3 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

10019171920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stoepler v. Silberberg · Stone v. Cook · Reaves v. Garrett's Adm'r · Farmers Exchange Bank v. Hageluken · Pace v. Pace

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In this case the acts of Bernard P. Bogy, in proving the will-and qualifying under it, are inconsistent with any theory except an election to take under it. The absence of personal property emphasized the character of his acts. He could' not say that he might execute the will in any particular and leave the real estate intact. The only property to be affected by it, as he must have known when he proved it, was the real estate now in dispute. His only reason for probating it and qualifying as executor was to carry out its provisions relating to the real' estate. He received a benefit under it, because he acquired the vendible fee-simple title to the half interest which it gave him. He had full knowledge of his rights. He knew what the law would give him independent of the will, and he knew what the will would give him. He knew all the property affected by the provisions of the will. Having that knowledge he deliberately chose to put the will into effect, declaring that he would execute its provisions.; therefore he elected to take under it. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.