Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 272 Mont. 64 - Indendi v. Workman

Indendi v. Workman’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2000
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on VanLuchene v. State · Ambrogini v. Todd · Bartsch v. Irvine Company · Jenkins v. Valley Garden Ranch, Inc. · Barrett v. Larsen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is apparent that the. whole purpose for the legislature’s requiring fences to be constructed in a certain manner is to insure, to the extent possible, that livestock not on open range are adequately confined and are not free to roam and to cause harm to persons and property or to breed with the livestock of others. There could be no other purpose for that sort of legislation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “to balance the tradition of the open range and the economic and geographic problems of raising livestock with the need for safer highways and the policy of taking all feasible measures to reduce the high incidence of traffic accidents and fatalities on Montana highways.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Any person constructing or maintaining any fence of any kind not described in 81-4-101 is liable in a civil action for all damages caused by reason of injury to stock resulting from such defective fence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.