Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 272 N.C. 417 - State v. Paige

State v. Paige’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

73
cited by 73 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
October 2011
most recently cited

71 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 73 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2011 · most notably North Carolina v. Pearce (1969), State v. Sanders (1975)

71 state decisions

400196819701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Patton v. State of North Carolina · State v. Case · State v. Beal · State v. Weaver · State v. Bridgers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Reading the challenged instruction in the instant case in its entirety, it seems manifest that the jury must have clearly understood that defendant had a legal right to elect to testify or not to testify in his own behalf, and that he had a right to rely upon the weakness of the State’s case. The trial judge in his conclusion of the challenged instruction made an infelicitous choice of words, but we think considering the instruction as a whole the jury could not have gotten the impression, as he contends, that the trial judge instructed the jury that the failure of defendant to testify in his own behalf was a fact to be considered against him.” Paige , at p. 423.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““ . . . [T]he failure of a defendant to go upon the witness stand and testify in his own behalf should not be made the subject of comment, except to inform the jury that a defendant may or may not testify in his own behalf as he may see fit, and his failure to testify ‘shall not create any presumption against him.’ G.S. 8-54.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““In the trial of all indictments, complaints, or other proceedings against persons charged with the commission of crimes, offenses or misdemeanors, the person so charged is, at his own request, but not otherwise, a competent witness, and his failure to make such a request shall not create any presumption against him.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.