272 N.J. Super. 543 - State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 2013
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Wong Sun v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Brown v. Illinois · Colorado v. Connelly
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Q. You’re Shawn Jackson? A. Yes. Q. How old are you, Mr. Jackson? A. Twenty-one. Q. Your lawyer has told me that you want to waive a trial by jury in the murder charges which is a capital case, as you know, and that you want to be tided by the [c]ourt without a jury both as to the guilt phase and the penalty phase if you’re found guilty. Is it true that you want to waive a jury trial? A. Yes. Q. And have you signed this form here? Is this your signature? A. Yes. Q. You signed this in court today? A. Yes. [[Image here]] THE COURT: The [c]ourt is satisfied that Mr. Jackson [is] represented by competent counsel in the person of Kevin Lewis and Charles Jurman. He understands his rights. He understands his rights to be tried by a jury. He waives that right, has executed a waiver in writing. ... Do you have anything you want to say or any questions, Mr. Jackson? THE DEFENDANT: No. [/A at 549, 640 A.2d 863 .]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“State v. Jackson, 272 N.J.Super. 543, 550 , 640 A. 2d 863 (App.Div.1994), certif. denied, 142 N.J. 450 , 663 A. 2d 1358 (1995); Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 237 , 93 S.Ct. 2041, 2053 , 36 L.Ed. 2d 854, 868-69 (1973) (citing Adams v. United States ex rel. McCann, 317 U.S. 269 , 63 S.Ct. 236 , 87 L.Ed. 268 (1942)) (defendant's waiver of jury trial must be express, intelligent and competent); Patton v. United States, 281 U.S. 276, 312 , 50 S.Ct. 253, 263 , 74 L.Ed. 854, 870 (1930) (defendant's consent to waiver of jury trial must be”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“I have discussed with Mr. Jackson his options -with regard to tidal, whether it be by jury or by a bench trial before the [j]udge alone. After having gone over this matter with Mr. Jackson, we have executed a request to be tried by the fj]udge and hereby waive the jury application. [Id. at 548, 640 A.2d 863 .]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.