Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 272 NW2D 292 - State v. Entze

State v. Entze’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
July 2005
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Davis v. Alaska · Douglas v. Alabama · Smith v. Illinois · 116 Cal. App. 2d 445 - Costa v. Regents of University of California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We believe that the receipt in evidence of a certified copy of the operator’s certificate and the certified copy of the list of certified chemical test operators, creates a prima facie case of the operator’s proficiency, but that it does not create an irrebuttable presumption of the operator’s proficiency, and that, accordingly, defense counsel should have been permitted to engage in a reasonable amount of cross-examination into the qualifications of the operator....””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““We affirm the trial court on the basis that, although the court was in error, the error was without prejudice, [footnote omitted] because defense counsel was later permitted without objection from the State to question the witness . . . .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.