State v. Entze’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
July 2005
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Davis v. Alaska · Douglas v. Alabama · Smith v. Illinois · 116 Cal. App. 2d 445 - Costa v. Regents of University of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We believe that the receipt in evidence of a certified copy of the operator’s certificate and the certified copy of the list of certified chemical test operators, creates a prima facie case of the operator’s proficiency, but that it does not create an irrebuttable presumption of the operator’s proficiency, and that, accordingly, defense counsel should have been permitted to engage in a reasonable amount of cross-examination into the qualifications of the operator....””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Guthmiller““We affirm the trial court on the basis that, although the court was in error, the error was without prejudice, [footnote omitted] because defense counsel was later permitted without objection from the State to question the witness . . . .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bartkowski
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.