State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“determine how prejudicial the evidence is, to what extent the evidence may distract the jury from the central question whether the defendant committed the charged crime”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“analyze the quantum of probative value of the evidence and consider the weight or strength of the evidence”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“is a matter of substance, not form or litany.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.