272 Or. App. 589 - State v. Finonen’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[w]hen the defendant makes an ambiguous or equivocal invocation of [the right against self-incrimination] under Article I, section 12, * * * the police are required to ask follow-up questions to clarify what the person meant before proceeding with interrogation.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 296 Or. App. 278 - State v. Taylor

2. “'who does not understand the Miranda warnings' " does not understand that he or she has those rights, "and statements made absent the defendant's understanding of those warnings * * * are presumptively involuntary and subject to suppression”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. 296 Or. App. 278 - State v. Taylor

3. “'who does not understand the Miranda warnings'”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. 296 Or. App. 278 - State v. Taylor