272 Pa. Super. 247 - Catina v. Maree’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently November 2010
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co. · Commonwealth v. Story · Whitner v. Lojeski · Burbage v. Boiler Engineering & Supply Co. · Commonwealth v. Gee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“admission of the testimony permitted appellee to confront the jury with a statement by a purported eyewitness corroborating other testimony that the victim was struck on the road. . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Catina v. Maree“are obscured in the haze of discordant recollections so common to this type of incident.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Catina v. Maree“centered primarily on the credibility of the witnesses. . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Catina v. Maree
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.