Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 272 S.C. 6 - Bradley v. Hullander

Bradley v. Hullander’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
November 2013
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2013 · most notably Gustafson v. Alloyd Co. (1995), Gilliland v. Elmwood Properties (1990)

2 federal appellate · 27 state decisions

22019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 771 (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003)

Relies on Wilko v. Swan · Erckman v. United States · Johnson v. BALDWIN · Allen-Parker Co. v. Lollis · 363 F. Supp. 1117 - Allen Organ Co. v. North American Rockwell Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(2) offers or sells a security by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading (the buyer not knowing of the untruth or omission), and who does not sustain the burden of proof that he did not know, and in the exercise of reasonable care could not have known, of the untruth or omission. . . .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Gustafson v. Alloyd Co. · Biales v. Young
  2. “matters as to which an average prudent investor ought reasonably to be informed before purchasing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. McGaha v. Mosley

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.