272 So. 2d 813 - Markham v. Markham’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently March 2005
4 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 265 So. 2d 59 - Markham v. Markham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““To safeguard the privacy of innocent persons, the interception of wire or oral communications when none of the parties to the communication has consented to the interception should be allowed only when authorized by a court of competent jurisdiction [and should remain under the control and supervision of the authorizing court]. * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Beaber v. Beaber“"The District Court has correctly answered the question presented and its decision is adopted as the decision of this Court. * * *"”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Horn v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.