Galloway v. King’s Empirical Analysis
1925
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 1936
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Wallace v. Southern Cotton Oil Co. · Cunningham v. International Railroad · Moore v. Lee · United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of Baltimore v. Lowry · Cunningham & Ellis v. Moore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The contract conclusively evidences a definite beginning, continuance, and ending of the thing to be done. And the concurring facts become conclusive as to the effect of the contract, that Tillery could not terminate his personal service whenever he chose without a breach of the contract, and that Galloway did not have the unrestricted right ■ to end the particular service whenever he chose to do so, without regard to the final result of the work. The result of the work was the essential thing to be done, which was the delivery to the Steger Grain Company of the entire bulk of ‘100 tons of hay.’ Such contract, as we conclude, constituted the relation of contractor and contractee, independent of subserviency, and not merely that of master and servant.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“‘The evidence in the case being wholly undisputed as to the contract itself, whether Tillery was an independent contractor presented a question for the court.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. King v. Galloway
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.