Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 272 SW3D 560 - Foreman v. Automatic Systems, Inc.

Foreman v. Automatic Systems, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
October 2021
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently October 2021

16 state decisions

120200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Simpson v. Satterfield · Tindall v. Waring Park Ass'n · Ganzevoort v. Russell · Reeser v. Yellow Freight System, Inc. · Fink v. Caudle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[h]owever, if the work injury advances the severity of the pre-existing condition, or if, as a result of the pre-existing condition, the employee suffers a new, distinct injury other than increased pain, then the work injury is compensable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “was aware of her complete medical history, and based his opinion on his personal knowledge of her condition.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “had the benefit of observing [the employee] over a period of years,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.