Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 272 S.W.3d 883 - State v. Jeffries

State v. Jeffries’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Grim · State v. Beine · Love v. State · State v. Moore · Reed v. Director of Revenue

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person commits the crime of sexual misconduct in the third degree if he solicits or requests another person to engage in sexual conduct under circumstances in which he knows that his requests or solicitation is likely to cause affront or alarm.” Moore, 90 S.W.3d at 67 (emphasis in original). Our supreme court's definition for “affront” and”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “‘[statutes relating to the same subject matter should be construed consistently with one another.’ ” Jeffries, 272 S.W.3d at 884 (quoting Reed v. Director of Revenue, 184 S.W.3d 564, 567 (Mo. banc 2006)). 6 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.