Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 272 Va. 481 - Stevens v. Com.

Stevens v. Com.’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

31 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Commonwealth v. Hudson · Stockton v. Commonwealth · Dowden v. Commonwealth · Lilly v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In making that determination, the reviewing court is to consider a host of factors, including the importance of the tainted evidence in the prosecution's case, whether that evidence was cumulative, the presence or absence of evidence corroborating or contradicting the tainted evidence on material points, and the overall strength of the prosecution's case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “so gross, wanton and culpable as to show a reckless disregard for human life.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.