Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 273 ALA 1 - Christison v. State

Christison v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
December 1979
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Moore-Handley Hardware Co. v. Williams · People v. McDaniels · Hall v. State · 32 Ala. App. 309 - Troup v. State · Pollock v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"While it might be argued, with some merit, that there is, in practical effect, no difference between a deposit slip and a check as being the instrumentality through which a party might receive money on deposit in a bank, we are not inclined to say that O'Brien v. State, supra , and the cases there relied on, should be overruled." Christison v. State , 273 Ala. 1 , 142 So.2d 663 , 666 (1960).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.