Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 273 Ala. 554 - Holmes v. Compton

Holmes v. Compton’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 2018

12 state decisions

40196219701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McCall v. Nettles · Henry v. White · Hardee v. Hardee · Carter Oil Co. v. Blair · Chastain v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'grant, bargain, sell and convey' " to the grantees, " 'their heirs and assigns, the following described real estate,' " which was followed by a description of property and a statement that " '[t]he grantor herein reserves to her self and her heirs one half of the oil and all minerals that may be discovered in said land.' " Our supreme court determined, in pertinent part: "[T]he [lower] court held that where there is an inconsistency between the granting clause containing words of inheritance and statements in the habendum or clauses subsequent to the granting clause, the granting clause in the deed will prevail and the clause containing the reservation of mineral rights will be considered void. "We do not take this view of the situation. Considering the entire deed we believe that a clear intention appears in the deed for the grantor to reserve certain mineral rights in the property. This is true although the granting clause contains words of inheritance. Accordingly there is no necessity to invoke any arbitrary rules of construction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'[t]he grantor herein reserves to her self and her heirs one half of the oil and all minerals that may be discovered in said land.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'their heirs and assigns, the following described real estate,'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.