Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 273 ARK 167 - Screeton v. Crumpler

Screeton v. Crumpler’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently April 2025

22 state decisions

6019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hendrix v. Franklin State Bank · 1 Smith & H. 304 - Lillard v. Tolliver · Lanning v. Gay · State Ex Rel. Coulter v. McFarland · Case v. Case

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] will contestant cannot take a non-suit under Rule 41, because such a contest is not an independent proceeding in itself. It would seriously disrupt the administration and distribution of estates if a will contest could be dismissed, voluntarily or without prejudice, and refiled at some indefinite later date. Hence the dismissal in the probate court was necessarily with prejudice.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.