¶1The appellant, Larry Ellender Wilson, by his attorney has filed a Motion for Rule on the Clerk. It is denied because the motion does not state good cause. While the attorney for the appellant says there was a misunderstanding between him and the court reporter, there is no acknowledgement that the sole reason the record was not filed was the negligence of the attorney. If the appellant’s attorney will concede that in an amended motion, then the appellant will be granted a belated appeal. See Moore v. State, 267 Ark. 548, 609 S.W. 2d 894 (1980).
273 Ark. 456
Wilson v. State
Decided July 20, 1981
Supreme Court of Arkansas · decided 1981-07-20
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently November 1983
2 state decisions
Relies on DeBell v. Texas General Realty, Inc. · Moore v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1981-07-20
View the full empirical analysis of this case →