Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 273 BR 682 - In Re Tomasevic

In Re Tomasevic’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
August 2017
most recently cited

3 district ·

Relationships

Applies 12 U.S.C. § 2605 · 12 U.S.C. § 2607

Relies on Matter of Chapman · Wickham v. United American Bank (In Re Property Leasing & Management, Inc.) · Rawlings v. Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc. · Katz v. Dime Sav. Bank, FSB · 173 F. Supp. 2d 809 - Johnstone v. Bank of America, N.A.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In other words, the plaintiff must establish that the economic injury was proximately caused by the bank’s violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. Thus, economic injury may include economic damages that flow from the bank’s failure to respond to a qualified written request as required by the statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.