The Beaverton’s Empirical Analysis
273 F. 539 · 1919
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1962
3 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on The China · In re Muir · The Carlo Poma · The Anthracite · Wells v. Armsrtong
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““I cannot see that this is in any sense involved in the rulo of The Anthracite and The Trocida; but, if it be, 1 can only say that the rule is not to be followed with consistency. Such a rule would be totally impracticable in practice. Ships are not to be required to take their tugs into preliminary council of deliberation.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. The Stella
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.