Bond v. Golden’s Empirical Analysis
273 F.2d 265 · 1959
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 1999
5 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Goldey v. Morning News · Mingenback v. Mingenback · Bucholz v. Hutton · Moore v. Dunham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““But regardless of whether a statute is liberally or strictly construed, substantial compliance with its requirements is essential before the benefits of the statute become available. Nor is it any answer to the fact of non-compliance with statutory requisites to assert that the general purposes of the statute have been met by means extraneous to the particulars of the statute.” (emphasis added)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tabas v. Crosby
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.